<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (11) TMI 292 - HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76673</link>
    <description>Entitlement to a concessional excise duty notification depended on actual compliance with its input-composition condition, not merely on an approved classification list. Concurrent factual findings that the assessee manipulated records, made false entries, and failed to use the requisite quantity of non-conventional pulp were treated as determinative and not reopened in writ jurisdiction, so the exemption claim failed and the duty demand and penalties were sustained. A penalty, however, cannot be imposed on a person who had already died before the penalty order; the penalty against the deceased director was therefore set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=114871" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (11) TMI 292 - HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76673</link>
      <description>Entitlement to a concessional excise duty notification depended on actual compliance with its input-composition condition, not merely on an approved classification list. Concurrent factual findings that the assessee manipulated records, made false entries, and failed to use the requisite quantity of non-conventional pulp were treated as determinative and not reopened in writ jurisdiction, so the exemption claim failed and the duty demand and penalties were sustained. A penalty, however, cannot be imposed on a person who had already died before the penalty order; the penalty against the deceased director was therefore set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76673</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>