<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (6) TMI 17 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76662</link>
    <description>The Court ruled in favor of the Petitioner, setting aside the notice to reopen the assessment for Assessment Year 2002-03. It held that there was no failure to disclose material facts necessary for assessment, as the assessee had fully disclosed all relevant information, including the absence of expenditure for earning dividend income. The Court emphasized the significance of complete and accurate disclosure by the assessee for the valid exercise of the power to reopen assessments.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 10 Jun 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 Oct 2010 12:05:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=114860" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (6) TMI 17 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76662</link>
      <description>The Court ruled in favor of the Petitioner, setting aside the notice to reopen the assessment for Assessment Year 2002-03. It held that there was no failure to disclose material facts necessary for assessment, as the assessee had fully disclosed all relevant information, including the absence of expenditure for earning dividend income. The Court emphasized the significance of complete and accurate disclosure by the assessee for the valid exercise of the power to reopen assessments.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Jun 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76662</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>