https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76657 Appeal beyond limitation was rejected for default because no application for condonation of delay was filed, prior clearance from the Committee on Dispute was not obtained, and the appellant failed to appear despite adjournment and a last opportunity. The Bench recorded that the defects remained uncured, no further adjournment was sought, and continued non-prosecution justified rejection of the appeal. en-us Mon, 18 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 12 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76657 Appeal beyond limitation was rejected for default because no application for condonation of delay was filed, prior clearance from the Committee on Dispute was not obtained, and the appellant failed to appear despite adjournment and a last opportunity. The Bench recorded that the defects remained uncured, no further adjournment was sought, and continued non-prosecution justified rejection of the appeal. Case-Laws Service Tax Mon, 18 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76657