<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (2) TMI 219 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76656</link>
    <description>The appeal before the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Mumbai was dismissed as the appellant chose to withdraw it. The appeal and pending applications were dismissed as withdrawn. Members present were Shri P.G. Chacko (Judicial) and Shri M.Veeraiyan (Technical).</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=114855" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (2) TMI 219 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76656</link>
      <description>The appeal before the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Mumbai was dismissed as the appellant chose to withdraw it. The appeal and pending applications were dismissed as withdrawn. Members present were Shri P.G. Chacko (Judicial) and Shri M.Veeraiyan (Technical).</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76656</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>