<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (8) TMI 592 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76646</link>
    <description>Where duty is finalised after a provisional assessment, the differential amount becomes recoverable under the provisional-assessment scheme itself. The text explains that once the proper officer determines the final liability, the assessee must pay any shortfall without a separate show cause notice under the ordinary short-levy machinery in Section 11A. It further notes that the limitation objection failed because the reliance placed on another decision was inapplicable to a case involving provisional assessment. The operative point is that recovery of differential duty follows the statutory framework of provisional assessment and does not require a distinct Section 11A demand.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=114845" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (8) TMI 592 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76646</link>
      <description>Where duty is finalised after a provisional assessment, the differential amount becomes recoverable under the provisional-assessment scheme itself. The text explains that once the proper officer determines the final liability, the assessee must pay any shortfall without a separate show cause notice under the ordinary short-levy machinery in Section 11A. It further notes that the limitation objection failed because the reliance placed on another decision was inapplicable to a case involving provisional assessment. The operative point is that recovery of differential duty follows the statutory framework of provisional assessment and does not require a distinct Section 11A demand.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76646</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>