https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76620 The appellate tribunal partly allowed the appeal by reducing the fine and penalty imposed on the appellants for misdeclaration of export goods, specifically quilts. The confiscation of wadding was set aside due to discrepancies in test reports and lack of evidence supporting diversion of imported silk into the local market. The judgment was pronounced by the Vice-President of the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, CHENNAI on 9-10-09. en-us Fri, 09 Oct 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 09 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76620 The appellate tribunal partly allowed the appeal by reducing the fine and penalty imposed on the appellants for misdeclaration of export goods, specifically quilts. The confiscation of wadding was set aside due to discrepancies in test reports and lack of evidence supporting diversion of imported silk into the local market. The judgment was pronounced by the Vice-President of the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, CHENNAI on 9-10-09. Case-Laws Customs Fri, 09 Oct 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76620