https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76617 The court held that the respondents failed to comply with the mandatory procedure of issuing a show cause notice before recovery of duty under Section 11(A) of the Act. The order of attachment was quashed, allowing the respondents to initiate fresh action following the procedure in Rule 14 of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. The writ petition was granted in favor of the petitioner. en-us Wed, 25 Nov 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 09 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76617 The court held that the respondents failed to comply with the mandatory procedure of issuing a show cause notice before recovery of duty under Section 11(A) of the Act. The order of attachment was quashed, allowing the respondents to initiate fresh action following the procedure in Rule 14 of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. The writ petition was granted in favor of the petitioner. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 25 Nov 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76617