<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (1) TMI 240 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76611</link>
    <description>Credit on service tax paid for rent-a-cab service was recognised as admissible because the issue had already been settled by prior Tribunal decisions treating such tax as eligible for input credit. The impugned order was found consistent with that settled position, so the revenue challenge failed and the appeal was rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=114813" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (1) TMI 240 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76611</link>
      <description>Credit on service tax paid for rent-a-cab service was recognised as admissible because the issue had already been settled by prior Tribunal decisions treating such tax as eligible for input credit. The impugned order was found consistent with that settled position, so the revenue challenge failed and the appeal was rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76611</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>