<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (4) TMI 142 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76573</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision to delete the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) for additions made in the quantum proceedings. The Tribunal found the appellant&#039;s explanations for the income additions to be bona fide, especially regarding the unexplained income under section 68. The Court concluded that no substantial legal question arose, affirming the deletion of the penalty.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 06 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Sep 2011 18:04:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=114778" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (4) TMI 142 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76573</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision to delete the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) for additions made in the quantum proceedings. The Tribunal found the appellant&#039;s explanations for the income additions to be bona fide, especially regarding the unexplained income under section 68. The Court concluded that no substantial legal question arose, affirming the deletion of the penalty.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76573</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>