<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (7) TMI 309 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76569</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision regarding the method of payment, weight shortfall, and clandestine removal of duty paid inputs. The Court found no substantial legal question, emphasizing the importance of evidence, particularly statements from individuals involved in factory operations. The appeal was dismissed with no order as to costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 13 Jul 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=114774" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (7) TMI 309 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76569</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision regarding the method of payment, weight shortfall, and clandestine removal of duty paid inputs. The Court found no substantial legal question, emphasizing the importance of evidence, particularly statements from individuals involved in factory operations. The appeal was dismissed with no order as to costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Jul 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76569</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>