<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (3) TMI 201 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76562</link>
    <description>The court upheld the requirement for gang saw machines for import licenses, deeming it reasonable and aimed at promoting domestic industry. The court found no mala fides or unreasonableness in the challenged circular and notification. Additionally, the court dismissed the contempt petition, ruling that the rejection of the import license application predated the court order, absolving the respondents of contempt. The petitioner was directed to pay Rs. 10,000 in costs to the respondents.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=114768" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (3) TMI 201 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76562</link>
      <description>The court upheld the requirement for gang saw machines for import licenses, deeming it reasonable and aimed at promoting domestic industry. The court found no mala fides or unreasonableness in the challenged circular and notification. Additionally, the court dismissed the contempt petition, ruling that the rejection of the import license application predated the court order, absolving the respondents of contempt. The petitioner was directed to pay Rs. 10,000 in costs to the respondents.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76562</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>