<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (12) TMI 228 - DELHI HIGH  COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76549</link>
    <description>The petition challenging the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal and rectification orders was dismissed by the High Court. The judgment highlighted the importance of stating all material facts in a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. It emphasized that the High Court should not act as an original or appellate authority in tax matters and advised seeking remedies under the Income Tax Act. The court reiterated that statutory remedies should be pursued over invoking Article 226 jurisdiction, citing the precedent set by the Supreme Court in similar cases. The dismissal was based on the availability of an alternative remedy through an appeal under the Income Tax Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=114756" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (12) TMI 228 - DELHI HIGH  COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76549</link>
      <description>The petition challenging the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal and rectification orders was dismissed by the High Court. The judgment highlighted the importance of stating all material facts in a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. It emphasized that the High Court should not act as an original or appellate authority in tax matters and advised seeking remedies under the Income Tax Act. The court reiterated that statutory remedies should be pursued over invoking Article 226 jurisdiction, citing the precedent set by the Supreme Court in similar cases. The dismissal was based on the availability of an alternative remedy through an appeal under the Income Tax Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76549</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>