<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (4) TMI 395 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76545</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the order directing the appellant to pay 10% of the value of sulphur cleared as an exempted product during the refining process. The Tribunal held that sulphur, being a by-product of refining, did not necessitate the payment of the said amount, rejecting the Revenue&#039;s argument based on common inputs for dutiable and exempted products. The decision favored the appellant, aligning with previous tribunal rulings and established legal principles.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=114752" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (4) TMI 395 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76545</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the order directing the appellant to pay 10% of the value of sulphur cleared as an exempted product during the refining process. The Tribunal held that sulphur, being a by-product of refining, did not necessitate the payment of the said amount, rejecting the Revenue&#039;s argument based on common inputs for dutiable and exempted products. The decision favored the appellant, aligning with previous tribunal rulings and established legal principles.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76545</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>