https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76520 The text examines whether an appellate court was justified in setting aside a conviction and sentence and remanding the prosecution for fresh disposal when the charge was alleged to be defective under a cited precedent. It states that the applicability of that precedent to the facts was for the trial court to examine, and that the appellate court committed no error in ordering remand. On that basis, no illegality or impropriety was found in the remand order, and the revision petition was described as without merit. en-us Tue, 17 Nov 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 30 Jun 2010 00:00:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76520 The text examines whether an appellate court was justified in setting aside a conviction and sentence and remanding the prosecution for fresh disposal when the charge was alleged to be defective under a cited precedent. It states that the applicability of that precedent to the facts was for the trial court to examine, and that the appellate court committed no error in ordering remand. On that basis, no illegality or impropriety was found in the remand order, and the revision petition was described as without merit. Case-Laws Income Tax Tue, 17 Nov 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76520