https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76515 The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the demand for Cenvat credit, penalty, and interest under Section 11A(1) of the Central Excise Act, 1944, and Rule 14 of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. It held that the appellant lawfully availed credit on the actual duty paid by suppliers at the time of clearance, rejecting the contention that credit was inadmissible on reduced input values. The judgment emphasized the conclusive nature of duty determination by the supplier's jurisdictional officer, upholding the appellant's right to claim Cenvat credit based on the duty paid. en-us Wed, 16 Sep 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 30 Jun 2010 00:00:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76515 The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the demand for Cenvat credit, penalty, and interest under Section 11A(1) of the Central Excise Act, 1944, and Rule 14 of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. It held that the appellant lawfully availed credit on the actual duty paid by suppliers at the time of clearance, rejecting the contention that credit was inadmissible on reduced input values. The judgment emphasized the conclusive nature of duty determination by the supplier's jurisdictional officer, upholding the appellant's right to claim Cenvat credit based on the duty paid. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 16 Sep 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76515