<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (1) TMI 453 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76494</link>
    <description>HC allowed appeals challenging AO&#039;s additions based on search statements. Tribunal&#039;s earlier deletion of additions was reversed due to insufficient verification of documentary evidence and oral statements. Court remanded cases back to AO for fresh assessment, directing comprehensive examination of all submitted evidence and ensuring proper legal scrutiny of claims made during search proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 May 2025 16:24:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=114701" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (1) TMI 453 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76494</link>
      <description>HC allowed appeals challenging AO&#039;s additions based on search statements. Tribunal&#039;s earlier deletion of additions was reversed due to insufficient verification of documentary evidence and oral statements. Court remanded cases back to AO for fresh assessment, directing comprehensive examination of all submitted evidence and ensuring proper legal scrutiny of claims made during search proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76494</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>