<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (2) TMI 399 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76476</link>
    <description>The court ruled in favor of the assessee on all issues, emphasizing the importance of consistency in accounting methods unless valid reasons exist for deviation. The judgment highlighted the need for the Revenue to provide sound justifications for altering accepted accounting practices and upheld the assessee&#039;s right to follow historical practices in claiming deductions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 Jun 2010 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=114684" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (2) TMI 399 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76476</link>
      <description>The court ruled in favor of the assessee on all issues, emphasizing the importance of consistency in accounting methods unless valid reasons exist for deviation. The judgment highlighted the need for the Revenue to provide sound justifications for altering accepted accounting practices and upheld the assessee&#039;s right to follow historical practices in claiming deductions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76476</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>