<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (8) TMI 547 - CESTAT,  AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76470</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, finding the demands barred by limitation as they were raised beyond the permissible period. The penalties imposed and confiscation of goods were set aside due to the absence of mala fide intent or suppression of facts, as well as the mutual mistake in MRP declaration for duty assessment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 Jun 2010 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=114678" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (8) TMI 547 - CESTAT,  AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76470</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, finding the demands barred by limitation as they were raised beyond the permissible period. The penalties imposed and confiscation of goods were set aside due to the absence of mala fide intent or suppression of facts, as well as the mutual mistake in MRP declaration for duty assessment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76470</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>