<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (4) TMI 384 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76468</link>
    <description>Excess freight collected over actual freight was held not to form part of the assessable value for central excise duty because it represented retained freight profit rather than value of the goods. The demand based on that excess freight was therefore unsustainable. As the principal duty demand failed, the connected levy of interest and penalty also could not survive, and consequential relief followed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 Jun 2010 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=114676" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (4) TMI 384 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76468</link>
      <description>Excess freight collected over actual freight was held not to form part of the assessable value for central excise duty because it represented retained freight profit rather than value of the goods. The demand based on that excess freight was therefore unsustainable. As the principal duty demand failed, the connected levy of interest and penalty also could not survive, and consequential relief followed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76468</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>