https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76464 An internal endorsement on a DFIA, made only in the department's file and not communicated to the importer, was held not to be an appealable order under Section 128 of the Customs Act. Because the endorsement did not itself determine rights or create immediate prejudice, it caused no appealable adjudication. The importer's proper remedy, if aggrieved by any adverse view, was to challenge the assessment order passed at the time of bill of entry. The later DGFT correspondence also removed the condition relating to payment of CVD, leaving no subsisting grievance on that aspect. en-us Wed, 09 Sep 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 26 Jun 2010 00:00:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76464 An internal endorsement on a DFIA, made only in the department's file and not communicated to the importer, was held not to be an appealable order under Section 128 of the Customs Act. Because the endorsement did not itself determine rights or create immediate prejudice, it caused no appealable adjudication. The importer's proper remedy, if aggrieved by any adverse view, was to challenge the assessment order passed at the time of bill of entry. The later DGFT correspondence also removed the condition relating to payment of CVD, leaving no subsisting grievance on that aspect. Case-Laws Customs Wed, 09 Sep 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76464