<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (2) TMI 176 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76463</link>
    <description>The High Court of Karnataka ruled against the assessee, determining that payments made to local police and rowdies for security purposes were not legitimate business expenses and therefore not allowable deductions. The court emphasized that payments made illegally, such as those considered bribery or precautionary measures against disturbances, could not be permitted as deductions. Consequently, the court set aside the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal&#039;s decision and upheld the orders of the Assessing Officer and Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals), highlighting the importance of legitimate business expenditures and disallowing illegal payments.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Jul 2013 11:27:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=114671" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (2) TMI 176 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76463</link>
      <description>The High Court of Karnataka ruled against the assessee, determining that payments made to local police and rowdies for security purposes were not legitimate business expenses and therefore not allowable deductions. The court emphasized that payments made illegally, such as those considered bribery or precautionary measures against disturbances, could not be permitted as deductions. Consequently, the court set aside the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal&#039;s decision and upheld the orders of the Assessing Officer and Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals), highlighting the importance of legitimate business expenditures and disallowing illegal payments.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76463</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>