<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (1) TMI 246 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76450</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the writ petitions challenging interim orders of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal regarding the waiver of pre-deposit in pending appeals. The court held that since the appeals had already been dismissed due to non-deposit as per the Customs Act, there was no need to consider the challenge against the interim orders. The tribunal had the discretion to grant partial waiver, and failure to comply with the deposit requirements rendered the appeals untenable. The court affirmed the tribunal&#039;s actions and advised the petitioners to pursue remedies against the final orders instead.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Jun 2010 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=114658" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (1) TMI 246 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76450</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the writ petitions challenging interim orders of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal regarding the waiver of pre-deposit in pending appeals. The court held that since the appeals had already been dismissed due to non-deposit as per the Customs Act, there was no need to consider the challenge against the interim orders. The tribunal had the discretion to grant partial waiver, and failure to comply with the deposit requirements rendered the appeals untenable. The court affirmed the tribunal&#039;s actions and advised the petitioners to pursue remedies against the final orders instead.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76450</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>