<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (2) TMI 394 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76438</link>
    <description>A 49-day delay in filing the appeal before the Commissioner (Appeals) was treated as satisfactorily explained, as the affidavit attributed the lapse to urgent personal work, subsequent non-attendance of the order during file rearrangement, and the deponent&#039;s age, which supported a liberal approach. The delay was therefore condoned, and the appeal was to be restored and heard on merits instead of being rejected on limitation. The stated principle is that a reasonable and adequately explained delay in filing an appeal should be condoned so that disputes are decided on merits rather than defeated on technical grounds.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Apr 2013 10:06:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=114647" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (2) TMI 394 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76438</link>
      <description>A 49-day delay in filing the appeal before the Commissioner (Appeals) was treated as satisfactorily explained, as the affidavit attributed the lapse to urgent personal work, subsequent non-attendance of the order during file rearrangement, and the deponent&#039;s age, which supported a liberal approach. The delay was therefore condoned, and the appeal was to be restored and heard on merits instead of being rejected on limitation. The stated principle is that a reasonable and adequately explained delay in filing an appeal should be condoned so that disputes are decided on merits rather than defeated on technical grounds.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76438</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>