<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (10) TMI 286 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76437</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039; decision to reduce the penalty imposed on M/s. V.M. Engineering Works under section 76 of the Finance Act, 1994 for delayed service tax payment. The penalty was reduced from Rs. 22,800 to Rs. 8,000 based on the appellant&#039;s compliance history, partial tax payment, and application of section 80 of the Finance Act, 1994. The Tribunal found the appellant eligible for leniency under section 80, rejecting the revenue&#039;s appeal for a stricter penalty and affirming the reduction to Rs. 8,000.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Jun 2010 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=114646" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (10) TMI 286 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76437</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039; decision to reduce the penalty imposed on M/s. V.M. Engineering Works under section 76 of the Finance Act, 1994 for delayed service tax payment. The penalty was reduced from Rs. 22,800 to Rs. 8,000 based on the appellant&#039;s compliance history, partial tax payment, and application of section 80 of the Finance Act, 1994. The Tribunal found the appellant eligible for leniency under section 80, rejecting the revenue&#039;s appeal for a stricter penalty and affirming the reduction to Rs. 8,000.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76437</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>