https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76411 Service tax and interest already deposited were treated as sufficient compliance with the statutory pre-deposit requirement, so no further deposit was insisted upon. The Commissioner (Appeals) had dismissed the appeal for failure to comply with a stay order requiring deposit of part of the penalty, but the appellants contended that the amounts already paid satisfied section 35F. As the Department raised no objection, the deposited sum was accepted as adequate for pre-deposit purposes, the additional requirement was waived, and the matter was remanded for decision on merits without insisting on further payment. en-us Tue, 30 Dec 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 24 Jun 2010 00:00:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76411 Service tax and interest already deposited were treated as sufficient compliance with the statutory pre-deposit requirement, so no further deposit was insisted upon. The Commissioner (Appeals) had dismissed the appeal for failure to comply with a stay order requiring deposit of part of the penalty, but the appellants contended that the amounts already paid satisfied section 35F. As the Department raised no objection, the deposited sum was accepted as adequate for pre-deposit purposes, the additional requirement was waived, and the matter was remanded for decision on merits without insisting on further payment. Case-Laws Service Tax Tue, 30 Dec 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76411