<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (2) TMI 171 - PUNJAB &amp; HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76407</link>
    <description>The High Court held that consignment agents are not liable to pay service tax under the category of C &amp;amp; F agents, overturning the Customs, Excise &amp;amp; Service Tax Appellate Tribunal&#039;s decision. The issue of the limitation period for issuing the notice under section 73 of the Finance Act was not addressed due to the finding of no liability. The Court did not consider the invocation of the extended period of limitation without justification. As a result, the appellant&#039;s appeal was allowed, setting aside the Tribunal&#039;s order and upholding the Commissioner&#039;s order in favor of the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2014 14:16:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=114618" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (2) TMI 171 - PUNJAB &amp; HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76407</link>
      <description>The High Court held that consignment agents are not liable to pay service tax under the category of C &amp;amp; F agents, overturning the Customs, Excise &amp;amp; Service Tax Appellate Tribunal&#039;s decision. The issue of the limitation period for issuing the notice under section 73 of the Finance Act was not addressed due to the finding of no liability. The Court did not consider the invocation of the extended period of limitation without justification. As a result, the appellant&#039;s appeal was allowed, setting aside the Tribunal&#039;s order and upholding the Commissioner&#039;s order in favor of the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76407</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>