<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (3) TMI 190 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76400</link>
    <description>Classification of services turned on whether contracts obligated delivery of software projects or provision of skilled personnel; contractual clauses on deliverables do not convert a manpower supply into IT service because quality and replacement provisions indicate emphasis on number and replacement of personnel, not project delivery, and thus the activity is supply of manpower. Consequently, service tax, cess and interest demand were confirmed and penalty under section 76 was upheld; penalty under section 78 was set aside as mutually exclusive and unnecessary.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2026 13:02:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=114611" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (3) TMI 190 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76400</link>
      <description>Classification of services turned on whether contracts obligated delivery of software projects or provision of skilled personnel; contractual clauses on deliverables do not convert a manpower supply into IT service because quality and replacement provisions indicate emphasis on number and replacement of personnel, not project delivery, and thus the activity is supply of manpower. Consequently, service tax, cess and interest demand were confirmed and penalty under section 76 was upheld; penalty under section 78 was set aside as mutually exclusive and unnecessary.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76400</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>