<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (5) TMI 464 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76388</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals, granting relief to the appellants in a case concerning the eligibility of Sulphuric Acid for exemption under Notification 67/95. The issue revolved around duty payment for Sulphuric Acid used in manufacturing Zinc products, with confusion arising from the Commissioner (Appeals) order. The Tribunal clarified that the Sulphuric Acid was rightfully entitled to the exemption due to its use in the manufacture of dutiable Zinc, dismissing the department&#039;s argument related to fertilizer manufacturing. The judgment emphasized the correct interpretation of the exemption notification and duty payment for Sulphuric Acid captively consumed in the manufacturing process.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Jun 2010 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=114601" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (5) TMI 464 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76388</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals, granting relief to the appellants in a case concerning the eligibility of Sulphuric Acid for exemption under Notification 67/95. The issue revolved around duty payment for Sulphuric Acid used in manufacturing Zinc products, with confusion arising from the Commissioner (Appeals) order. The Tribunal clarified that the Sulphuric Acid was rightfully entitled to the exemption due to its use in the manufacture of dutiable Zinc, dismissing the department&#039;s argument related to fertilizer manufacturing. The judgment emphasized the correct interpretation of the exemption notification and duty payment for Sulphuric Acid captively consumed in the manufacturing process.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76388</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>