<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (10) TMI 220 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76362</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the decision of the learned single Judge, affirming the validity of the successor Bench&#039;s decision based on the majority opinion regarding clubbing of units for differential duty and penalty under Section 129C(5) of the Customs Act. The Court held that it was not necessary for a matter to be reheard by a different Bench solely because original members who disagreed were no longer available, emphasizing the final decision would be based on the majority opinion of the Judges who heard the case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 12 Oct 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Jun 2010 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=114576" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (10) TMI 220 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76362</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the decision of the learned single Judge, affirming the validity of the successor Bench&#039;s decision based on the majority opinion regarding clubbing of units for differential duty and penalty under Section 129C(5) of the Customs Act. The Court held that it was not necessary for a matter to be reheard by a different Bench solely because original members who disagreed were no longer available, emphasizing the final decision would be based on the majority opinion of the Judges who heard the case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Oct 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76362</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>