<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (12) TMI 193 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76338</link>
    <description>Refund under Notification No. 32/2004-ST had to be reconsidered where freight was paid to individual truck owners operating their own vehicles, because the Tribunal precedent on non-taxability of such service had not been examined by the lower authorities. The matter was remitted for fresh adjudication after considering the relevant precedent and the assessee&#039;s supporting declarations and particulars, with reasonable opportunity of hearing.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Aug 2010 12:44:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=114553" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (12) TMI 193 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76338</link>
      <description>Refund under Notification No. 32/2004-ST had to be reconsidered where freight was paid to individual truck owners operating their own vehicles, because the Tribunal precedent on non-taxability of such service had not been examined by the lower authorities. The matter was remitted for fresh adjudication after considering the relevant precedent and the assessee&#039;s supporting declarations and particulars, with reasonable opportunity of hearing.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76338</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>