<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (9) TMI 403 - CESTAT,  AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76310</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner&#039;s decision on the classification and excisability of the goods but set aside the penalty imposed under Section 11AC of CEA, 1944. The appellant was granted entitlement to Cenvat credit and the treatment of the price as cum-duty-price. The appeal was partially allowed in favor of the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 Jun 2010 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=114526" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (9) TMI 403 - CESTAT,  AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76310</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner&#039;s decision on the classification and excisability of the goods but set aside the penalty imposed under Section 11AC of CEA, 1944. The appellant was granted entitlement to Cenvat credit and the treatment of the price as cum-duty-price. The appeal was partially allowed in favor of the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76310</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>