<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (8) TMI 493 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76306</link>
    <description>Rule 57CC required a manufacturer clearing both dutiable and exempted goods to maintain separate accounts for inputs used in exempted products or comply with the prescribed payment mechanism. A reversal of credit made only after exempted clearances had already taken place did not satisfy the rule and did not relieve the manufacturer of the statutory amount payable. Where the dispute turned on interpretation of the rule and related provisions, penalty was treated as unwarranted and set aside. The substantive demand was maintained, but the penalty component was deleted, giving only partial relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2015 11:55:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=114522" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (8) TMI 493 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76306</link>
      <description>Rule 57CC required a manufacturer clearing both dutiable and exempted goods to maintain separate accounts for inputs used in exempted products or comply with the prescribed payment mechanism. A reversal of credit made only after exempted clearances had already taken place did not satisfy the rule and did not relieve the manufacturer of the statutory amount payable. Where the dispute turned on interpretation of the rule and related provisions, penalty was treated as unwarranted and set aside. The substantive demand was maintained, but the penalty component was deleted, giving only partial relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76306</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>