<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (1) TMI 167 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76297</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Chennai ruled in favor of the assessee, setting aside penalties imposed under sections 76 and 78 of the Finance Act, 1994 for non-payment of service tax within time. The tribunal found that the burden on the Revenue to establish suppression on the part of the assessee with intention to evade payment of tax was not met. The penalty of Rs. 1,000 imposed under section 77 was not challenged and upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2010 10:37:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=114513" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (1) TMI 167 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76297</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Chennai ruled in favor of the assessee, setting aside penalties imposed under sections 76 and 78 of the Finance Act, 1994 for non-payment of service tax within time. The tribunal found that the burden on the Revenue to establish suppression on the part of the assessee with intention to evade payment of tax was not met. The penalty of Rs. 1,000 imposed under section 77 was not challenged and upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76297</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>