<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (1) TMI 163 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76291</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Chennai ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the penalty imposed under section 78 of the Finance Act, 1994 due to lack of suppression. However, the penalty under section 77 was upheld as the appellants had contravened the provisions of the Act by not filing returns. The appeal was allowed in part.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2010 10:35:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=114508" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (1) TMI 163 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76291</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Chennai ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the penalty imposed under section 78 of the Finance Act, 1994 due to lack of suppression. However, the penalty under section 77 was upheld as the appellants had contravened the provisions of the Act by not filing returns. The appeal was allowed in part.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76291</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>