<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (8) TMI 488 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76256</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, MUMBAI, ruled in favor of the appellants, holding that they are not required to reverse the Cenvat credit of Additional Duty of Customs (CVD) on imported defective nylon tyre cord fabric cleared after processing. The Tribunal found that the activities undertaken did not amount to manufacturing, thus upholding the appellants&#039; entitlement to Cenvat Credit under Rule 16 of the Central Excise Rules. The decision was based on established legal principles and precedents, including previous Tribunal decisions and a Supreme Court ruling, resulting in the disposal of the appeal in favor of the appellants.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Jun 2010 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=114475" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (8) TMI 488 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76256</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, MUMBAI, ruled in favor of the appellants, holding that they are not required to reverse the Cenvat credit of Additional Duty of Customs (CVD) on imported defective nylon tyre cord fabric cleared after processing. The Tribunal found that the activities undertaken did not amount to manufacturing, thus upholding the appellants&#039; entitlement to Cenvat Credit under Rule 16 of the Central Excise Rules. The decision was based on established legal principles and precedents, including previous Tribunal decisions and a Supreme Court ruling, resulting in the disposal of the appeal in favor of the appellants.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76256</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>