https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76242 The tribunal allowed the appeals of the company and its Directors and the employees on the ground of violation of principles of natural justice, remanding the matters for fresh adjudication. The appeal regarding the restriction of duty liability based on cash found was rejected. The appeal by M/s. Kundil Ispat Ltd. was dismissed, affirming that the company qualifies as a "person" under Rule 26 and is subject to penalty. en-us Tue, 09 Jun 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 17 Jun 2010 00:00:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76242 The tribunal allowed the appeals of the company and its Directors and the employees on the ground of violation of principles of natural justice, remanding the matters for fresh adjudication. The appeal regarding the restriction of duty liability based on cash found was rejected. The appeal by M/s. Kundil Ispat Ltd. was dismissed, affirming that the company qualifies as a "person" under Rule 26 and is subject to penalty. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 09 Jun 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76242