https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76241 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, granting the appeal and consequential relief. It upheld the appellant's entitlement to claim a refund for duty paid on Light Diesel Oil (LDO), emphasizing the continued validity of Notification No. 22/2003 and the appellant's eligibility for duty exemption. The decision highlighted the importance of considering legal provisions like Section 11B and unjust enrichment in refund claims, ultimately providing relief to the appellant based on the circumstances presented. en-us Wed, 08 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 17 Jun 2010 00:00:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76241 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, granting the appeal and consequential relief. It upheld the appellant's entitlement to claim a refund for duty paid on Light Diesel Oil (LDO), emphasizing the continued validity of Notification No. 22/2003 and the appellant's eligibility for duty exemption. The decision highlighted the importance of considering legal provisions like Section 11B and unjust enrichment in refund claims, ultimately providing relief to the appellant based on the circumstances presented. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 08 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76241