<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (4) TMI 358 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76236</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the Commissioner&#039;s order and allowed the appeal, ruling that cylinder rental charges should not be included in the assessable value for central excise duty assessment. The Tribunal emphasized established legal principles and precedents, citing a previous Final Order and a Supreme Court judgment. This decision provided clarity on the issue, ensuring consistency with previous decisions and legal interpretations.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Jun 2010 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=114456" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (4) TMI 358 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76236</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the Commissioner&#039;s order and allowed the appeal, ruling that cylinder rental charges should not be included in the assessable value for central excise duty assessment. The Tribunal emphasized established legal principles and precedents, citing a previous Final Order and a Supreme Court judgment. This decision provided clarity on the issue, ensuring consistency with previous decisions and legal interpretations.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76236</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>