<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (10) TMI 237 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76223</link>
    <description>The Tribunal confirmed a service tax liability of Rs. 97,387 for appellants in the telephone services sector, along with penalties under sections 76 and 78 of the Finance Act, 1994. The notice&#039;s validity was upheld despite delay, based on discrepancies between income and tax payments. Accounting errors were deemed unintentional, leading to excess payments in one year and underpayments in another. While penalties were set aside due to factors like company size and lack of investigation, the appeal was rejected concerning service tax and interest.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Sep 2011 10:31:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=114443" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (10) TMI 237 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76223</link>
      <description>The Tribunal confirmed a service tax liability of Rs. 97,387 for appellants in the telephone services sector, along with penalties under sections 76 and 78 of the Finance Act, 1994. The notice&#039;s validity was upheld despite delay, based on discrepancies between income and tax payments. Accounting errors were deemed unintentional, leading to excess payments in one year and underpayments in another. While penalties were set aside due to factors like company size and lack of investigation, the appeal was rejected concerning service tax and interest.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76223</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>