https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76218 A bail order may be interfered with only for compelling reasons, such as manifest illegality, injustice, improper exercise of discretion, irrelevant considerations, non-application of mind, statutory bar, or gross procedural impropriety. In a merits challenge, the superior court may assess both the material before the magistrate at the time bail was granted and subsequent conduct, not merely post-bail conduct alone. The omission to discuss every cited precedent does not, by itself, vitiate the bail order, particularly where the omission is not attributable to the accused. Interference is warranted only where the order causes gross injustice or the concession of bail is abused. en-us Mon, 16 Nov 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 16 Jun 2010 00:00:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76218 A bail order may be interfered with only for compelling reasons, such as manifest illegality, injustice, improper exercise of discretion, irrelevant considerations, non-application of mind, statutory bar, or gross procedural impropriety. In a merits challenge, the superior court may assess both the material before the magistrate at the time bail was granted and subsequent conduct, not merely post-bail conduct alone. The omission to discuss every cited precedent does not, by itself, vitiate the bail order, particularly where the omission is not attributable to the accused. Interference is warranted only where the order causes gross injustice or the concession of bail is abused. Case-Laws Customs Mon, 16 Nov 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76218