<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (10) TMI 233 - HIGH COURT of KERALA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76209</link>
    <description>The High Court held that reassessments under section 147 of the Income-tax Act were within time as material facts necessary for assessment were not disclosed, allowing the appeals. The Court deemed appeals maintainable based on tax effect criteria, as the tax involved in relevant years exceeded the prescribed limit. The Court remanded the matter for further assessment, emphasizing the importance of considering data from the firm&#039;s accounts.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Jun 2010 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=114429" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (10) TMI 233 - HIGH COURT of KERALA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76209</link>
      <description>The High Court held that reassessments under section 147 of the Income-tax Act were within time as material facts necessary for assessment were not disclosed, allowing the appeals. The Court deemed appeals maintainable based on tax effect criteria, as the tax involved in relevant years exceeded the prescribed limit. The Court remanded the matter for further assessment, emphasizing the importance of considering data from the firm&#039;s accounts.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76209</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>