<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (6) TMI 499 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76202</link>
    <description>A demand under Section 11A must be raised against an existing person chargeable with duty, and not against a non-existent collective label where the units are separate legal and manufacturing entities. Clearances of independent units cannot be clubbed, or exemption under Notification No. 5/98-C.E. denied, unless a legally sustainable basis for treating them as one taxable entity is first established. Allegations of clandestine removal, confiscation, penalty and credit denial linked to such a collective approach require unit-wise reconsideration. The order below was set aside and the matter remitted for fresh adjudication after treating the units separately and following natural justice.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Jun 2010 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=114422" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (6) TMI 499 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76202</link>
      <description>A demand under Section 11A must be raised against an existing person chargeable with duty, and not against a non-existent collective label where the units are separate legal and manufacturing entities. Clearances of independent units cannot be clubbed, or exemption under Notification No. 5/98-C.E. denied, unless a legally sustainable basis for treating them as one taxable entity is first established. Allegations of clandestine removal, confiscation, penalty and credit denial linked to such a collective approach require unit-wise reconsideration. The order below was set aside and the matter remitted for fresh adjudication after treating the units separately and following natural justice.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76202</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>