<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (5) TMI 446 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76200</link>
    <description>The Tribunal classified the WISMO Modules under CTH 85299090, granting a concessional duty rate. Allegations of mis-declaration and extended period invocation were dismissed, leading to the setting aside of confiscation and penalty. The decision highlighted the significance of precise classification and deemed penalties unjust in cases of departmental uncertainty.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2015 11:57:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=114420" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (5) TMI 446 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76200</link>
      <description>The Tribunal classified the WISMO Modules under CTH 85299090, granting a concessional duty rate. Allegations of mis-declaration and extended period invocation were dismissed, leading to the setting aside of confiscation and penalty. The decision highlighted the significance of precise classification and deemed penalties unjust in cases of departmental uncertainty.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76200</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>