<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (9) TMI 359 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76193</link>
    <description>The tribunal partly allowed the appeal, directing the recomputation of Drawback/DEPB claims based on lower values declared to the Delhi Chamber of Commerce. The excess amounts claimed were to be recovered with interest, and a penalty of Rs.50,000/- was upheld to deter future misconduct. The decision stressed the significance of accurate invoicing practices in international trade and the repercussions of attempting to defraud customs authorities.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Jun 2010 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=114413" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (9) TMI 359 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76193</link>
      <description>The tribunal partly allowed the appeal, directing the recomputation of Drawback/DEPB claims based on lower values declared to the Delhi Chamber of Commerce. The excess amounts claimed were to be recovered with interest, and a penalty of Rs.50,000/- was upheld to deter future misconduct. The decision stressed the significance of accurate invoicing practices in international trade and the repercussions of attempting to defraud customs authorities.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76193</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>