<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (5) TMI 443 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76191</link>
    <description>A Godrej safe procured by a 100% export-oriented undertaking for storing raw and finished diamonds was treated as eligible for duty-free procurement under Notification No. 126/94-C.E. because it was installed in the factory and fell within the notification&#039;s broad category of office equipment. The lower authorities&#039; narrower view that the safe was outside the annexure was not accepted, and the demand was therefore held unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Jun 2010 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=114411" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (5) TMI 443 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76191</link>
      <description>A Godrej safe procured by a 100% export-oriented undertaking for storing raw and finished diamonds was treated as eligible for duty-free procurement under Notification No. 126/94-C.E. because it was installed in the factory and fell within the notification&#039;s broad category of office equipment. The lower authorities&#039; narrower view that the safe was outside the annexure was not accepted, and the demand was therefore held unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76191</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>