https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76172 The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Chennai ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the Service Tax demand and penalty imposed for laying pipelines, following the precedent set in Indian Hume Pipe Co. Ltd.'s case, which determined that laying pipelines does not constitute "Erection, Commissioning and Installation Service" subject to tax. en-us Tue, 08 Dec 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 31 Aug 2010 17:16:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76172 The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Chennai ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the Service Tax demand and penalty imposed for laying pipelines, following the precedent set in Indian Hume Pipe Co. Ltd.'s case, which determined that laying pipelines does not constitute "Erection, Commissioning and Installation Service" subject to tax. Case-Laws Service Tax Tue, 08 Dec 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76172