<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (12) TMI 137 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76161</link>
    <description>Delayed compliance with a pre-deposit condition attracted interest at 9% on the belated deposit for the period of delay, and restoration of the appeal before the appellate tribunal was made conditional on such payment. The direction was linked to expeditious hearing and disposal of the appeal after compliance. It was also clarified that the order would not affect the separate pending civil dispute, and the amount lying in the High Court would remain there until disposal of the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Dec 2015 16:05:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=114381" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (12) TMI 137 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76161</link>
      <description>Delayed compliance with a pre-deposit condition attracted interest at 9% on the belated deposit for the period of delay, and restoration of the appeal before the appellate tribunal was made conditional on such payment. The direction was linked to expeditious hearing and disposal of the appeal after compliance. It was also clarified that the order would not affect the separate pending civil dispute, and the amount lying in the High Court would remain there until disposal of the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76161</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>