<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (5) TMI 435 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76153</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the order and remanded the case to the Commissioner for reconsideration. The Commissioner was directed to assess whether the appellants&#039; accounts complied with Rule 6(2) regarding separate accounts for dutiable and exempted goods. The Tribunal emphasized the need for proper investigation and clear distinction in the accounts. The appeal was disposed of with instructions for a fresh decision by the Commissioner in line with the law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 12 Jun 2010 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=114373" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (5) TMI 435 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76153</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the order and remanded the case to the Commissioner for reconsideration. The Commissioner was directed to assess whether the appellants&#039; accounts complied with Rule 6(2) regarding separate accounts for dutiable and exempted goods. The Tribunal emphasized the need for proper investigation and clear distinction in the accounts. The appeal was disposed of with instructions for a fresh decision by the Commissioner in line with the law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76153</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>