<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (5) TMI 434 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76151</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, finding that the imported goods were legally imported and properly cleared under advance licenses. It held that Customs authorities cannot question the disposal of manufactured goods after export obligation completion. The Tribunal also emphasized that duty demand and penalty were not sustainable once the export obligation was fulfilled. Additionally, it concluded that Customs authorities are bound by the licenses issued and cannot go beyond them. The impugned order was set aside, and the Tribunal provided consequential relief to the appellant, recommending clarificatory instructions on jurisdiction matters.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 12 Jun 2010 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=114371" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (5) TMI 434 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76151</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, finding that the imported goods were legally imported and properly cleared under advance licenses. It held that Customs authorities cannot question the disposal of manufactured goods after export obligation completion. The Tribunal also emphasized that duty demand and penalty were not sustainable once the export obligation was fulfilled. Additionally, it concluded that Customs authorities are bound by the licenses issued and cannot go beyond them. The impugned order was set aside, and the Tribunal provided consequential relief to the appellant, recommending clarificatory instructions on jurisdiction matters.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76151</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>