<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (5) TMI 93 - CESTAT Ahmedabad</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76136</link>
    <description>Service tax exemption under Notification No. 16/2002-ST was denied because supporting certificates were not produced, even though the services to international organisations were accepted by the lower authorities. The lapse in producing the certificates was treated as a bona fide mistake, and the assessee did not contest the short tax demand. The service tax demand was therefore sustained, but penalty was set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 24 May 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 May 2013 10:48:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=114356" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (5) TMI 93 - CESTAT Ahmedabad</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76136</link>
      <description>Service tax exemption under Notification No. 16/2002-ST was denied because supporting certificates were not produced, even though the services to international organisations were accepted by the lower authorities. The lapse in producing the certificates was treated as a bona fide mistake, and the assessee did not contest the short tax demand. The service tax demand was therefore sustained, but penalty was set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 May 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76136</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>